“My house is me and I am it. My house is where I like to be and it looks like all my dreams.” This Daniel Pinkwater sentiment is posted outside Giovanna Tanzillo’s house in Piedmont, Calif.
The sign makes perfect sense once you see this house; it’s quite the showstopper in brilliant shades of orange with violet and fuchsia accents. Perched prominently on a corner, it’s impossible to miss as you head into Piedmont’s conservative neighborhood of upscale, historically pedigreed homes. I pass by it all the time, and it has always intrigued me.
As with any artistic endeavor, the success of this project owes much to its thorough planning and careful execution. No detail was overlooked — even the wood-chip mulch was custom-dyed purple to match.
As one might imagine, the house is quite polarizing when it comes to this debate: Where do the rights of private property owners end and those of the neighborhood begin?
In Piedmont, you’d be hard-pressed to find hues more vibrant than grays, blues and earth tones. Surprisingly, there is no city planning law or homeowners’ association restricting or dictating the color choices of homes in this neighborhood. It’s as though there’s an unspoken agreement among the homeowners to keep things understated and dignified. Well, with the exception of Tanzillo’s landmark.
It all started with a leaky porch roof. But why just patch a roof when you can turn it into a bold design statement? When Tanzillo hired Ace Architects to do the repair, their home remodel proposal was humorous, creative and modestly priced. Not only did Tanzillo love it, she took the proposal one step further by challenging the firm to go to town with the exterior color scheme. The Ace Architect color palette took its twin inspiration from Italian homes of the late 1800s, as well as the vivid color choices of the Oakland-based Society of Six, an association of six young California artists from the 1920s known for their fresh, exuberant and direct style of painting.
The Piedmont Planning Commission doesn’t regulate color as a general rule, so Tanzillo’s new construction had only to match the existing architecture. Assistant City Planner Kevin Jackson says the Commission found the whimsy of the project enticing, so enthusiastically approved her plans. “Change of any kind always causes comments,” Jackson explains, “until people get acclimated.”
As soon as the paint began going up, the reactions started rolling in. Nasty messages arrived from shocked and appalled neighbors telling Tanzillo to “move someplace where there are more hippies” and asking her “what are you thinking?!” There were even threats made to place a “color ordinance” on the ballot. I must admit I, too, was initially skeptical. The colors were in complete contrast to the surrounding homes and made it stick out like a sore thumb.
Tanzillo’s house color choices drive this debate: If you move into a traditional neighborhood, should you respect and conform to its overall look? Does our society support self-expression, or are we afraid of change? In a topical post on my blog, Hue, a reader commented, “I firmly believe that part of what guides us to purchase a house is its location. If that location is a neighborhood, you are buying into that community. In my mind that’s an unspoken commitment to be part of and honor the overall fabric of it.”
In keeping with this philosophy, many cities tightly control exterior color decisions. Take Saddleback, a gated neighborhood within the master-planned community of Blackhawk, just south of where I grew up in the San Francisco Bay Area. Exterior color proposals must be presented to the Design Review Board to “ensure that the harmony of the community is intact,” explains Property Manager Jeff Karimi. He recalls one application to paint a house pink; the board promptly rejected it as unharmonious with the surrounding homes.
Eventually, Tanzillo finished her remodel, complete with new landscaping that complimented the home’s look and palette. “Life is too short to worry about everyone’s opinion,” declares Tanzillo. Trusting in her architect’s vision, she felt confident the final look would make sense. I think she was right. Now when I drive by and see the house in the context of its surrounding garden, it seems less out of place. In fact, after admiring the workmanship, it’s really grown on me. As with any artistic endeavor, the success of this project owes much to its thorough planning and careful execution. No detail was overlooked — even the wood-chip mulch was custom-dyed purple to match.
Neighbors have warmed to the new look, and opinions have become more complimentary. “I get notes every week from people telling me how much they love my house,” says Tanzillo proudly. “People yell from their car, ‘your house makes me happy!’”
You need to have a sense of humor to appreciate the house, since it’s certainly not designed for the masses. But then again, who’s to say what the masses will think if everyone keeps an open mind?
What are your thoughts on the matter? Does restricting exterior color hurt or help a community?
Post your reply below.
Rachel Perls is an architectural color consultant based in the San Francisco Bay Area. In addition to holding a fine arts degree, Rachel is professionally trained through the
International Association of Color Consultants, where she also serves as a committee chair. Through a multidisciplinary approach to supportive design, Rachel helps clients realize the full potential of color in both residential and commercial spaces. Be sure to check out her nationally recognized blog,
Hue, dedicated to color.
All images provided by and used with the permission of Ace Architect.
You may also enjoy:
- Full Spectrum: Redefining Circus Color
- Full Spectrum: Stripe It Rich
- Full Spectrum: The New Neutrals
I believe in deliberate choices, and making them while aware of the positive and negative consequences they may have. All within the context of “thorough planning and careful execution. No detail was overlooked…” And, it is very important not to prejudge colors out of the finished context. “As soon as the paint began going up,” is the exact time I turn my ears off. Now if the job is done and the colors still look wrong, then I’m open to hearing criticism and dealing with it.
ONLY in VERY specific situations should color be controlled by anyone other than an owner.
In historic neighborhoods, where there is a preponderance of preserved/restored building types, it may be of value to society to maintain a certain look.
It makes no sense in suburbia where the color Putty has been dictated by an uninformed community board.
Recently we changed the color of our house from a pale yellow with white trim to something reminiscent of our travels to Mexico. As in Piedmont, in our Portland, Oregon neighborhood “you’d be hard-pressed to find hues more vibrant than grays, blues and earth tones.” We chose Marigold for the main color and gray for the trim. The trim looks great with the roof. Mike said the color initially reminded him of the yellow line on the highway.
Interestingly, most of the neighbors love the color. Only our parents wouldn’t have chosen such a bold yellow.
We felt no obligation to check with our neighbors before painting. I would think they are happy that we keep our house looking good.
Love the photo and would like to see a picture of the whole house on its lot. As for our duties to the neighborhood, not only do we “buy into” and “honor” it, we also become part of the fabric. Holding back on color does not contribute anything.
Susan- i posted some pics on my blog Hue with a bit more of the back story from my interview. Enjoy!
I’m so glad you took this opportunity to investigate the owner’s side of the story! While the color choices are still glaring (IMHO), it doesn’t seem as bad. Great post!
Why only one picture? What’s the point in an article about color?